Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Social Pediatrics Unit, Kayseri, Turkey**
The Head of Local Health Authority, Kayseri, Turkey***
Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Kayseri, Turkey****
Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Kayseri, Turkey*****
Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Kayseri, Turkey******
Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey
What is already known on this topic?
Neck circumference (NC) has been shown to be one of the reliable and practical additional measurements to define obesity in school children and adolescents. Limited information is available about the use of NC in preschool children.
What this study adds?
NC may be useful to define obesity as an additional measurement in preschool children as well.
Objective: Limited information is available about the use of neck circumference (NC) to assess obesity in preschool children. This study aims to provide NC percentiles and determine the cut-off levels of NC as a measure to assess obesity in preschool children.
Methods: The data were obtained from the Anthropometry of Turkish Children aged 0-6 years (ATCA-06) study database. A total of 21 family health centers were chosen and children aged 2-6 years old from all socioeconomic levels were randomly selected from the lists of district midwives; 1766 children (874 male and 892 female; 88.3% of sample size) were included in the study. The smoothed centile curves of NC were constructed by the LMS method. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to calculate cut-off points for NC using body mass index ≥95th percentile.
Results: Mean NC was greater in males than females. Cut-off values for obesity were found to be statistically significant in both genders other than 3 years old boys. The NC percentiles of Turkish preschool children were slightly greater than those of other European preschool children in both genders. This difference disappeared around the adiposity rebound period. The 97th percentile values for Turkish preschool children continue to be greater in both genders.
Conclusion: NC may be useful to define obesity in preschool children. Since ethnic and various other factors may have a role in incidence of obesity, local reference data are important in assessment of obesity.
Obesity in early childhood is on the increase and this is of great concern because of the relationship between childhood obesity and metabolic complications and other clinical comorbidities encountered in adult life (1). In the United States, obesity prevalence was reported to be 12.4% for boys and 10% for girls in a recent study in children aged 3 to 5 years (2). In our data set, obesity prevalence was identical in both genders as 5% in Turkish children aged 0-84 months (3). It was reported that children at the 50th percentile of body-mass index (BMI) at the age of 5 years had a 6% probability of being obese at the age of 14 years and that this probability increased to 25% among 5-year-olds at the 85th percentile and to 47% among those at the 95th percentile (1). Since early childhood adiposity may lead to cardiometabolic health effects in later years, it should be closely monitored to prevent these complications (4,5,6,7,8).
Children have a rapid increase in adiposity during the first year of life. After infancy, adiposity declines and reaches a minimum and rebound at around 5 to 6 years. Subsequently, adiposity shows a steady increase throughout childhood and adolescence (6). In monitoring for obesity, it is important to follow the course of adiposity and identify the age at which excess weight gain occurs. Although BMI is a frequently used measurement to asses total body fat content, it fails to provide sufficient information regarding body fat distribution. Since upper body adiposity is considered to be a significant determinant of cardiometabolic risk factors, it should be monitored rather than assessing total body fat content. Recent studies have shown that neck circumference (NC) is one of the reliable and practical anthropometric measurements to assess upper body adiposity and consequently to assess cardiometabolic risk as a result of irregular fat distribution (9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19).
There are only a few studies that provide reference data on NC measurements for school children and adolescents (20,21). NC reference values for preschool children are especially limited (21).
This present study aims to 1) provide NC percentiles and determine cut-off levels of NC for obesity in preschool children; 2) to explore the importance of NC measurements as an additional tool for assessment of obesity in preschool children.
The data were obtained from the Anthropometry of Turkish Children aged 0-6 years (ATCA-06) study database. The data were collected between September 2009 to May 2010 in a large city in Central Turkey with a population of over 1,200,000. A two-stage probability sampling was used to select children from each socioeconomic level. In the first stage, Family Medicine Centers (FMCs) located in the city center and suburbs were selected randomly. These Centers address a population of all socioeconomic levels (low, medium, high). In determining socioeconomic levels, we used the evaluation of local health authorities. A total of 21 FMCs were chosen, and children of ages 2-6 years from these centers were randomly selected from the district midwives’ lists according to their families’ income. Parents along with their children were invited to the FMC. Children whose parents did not consent to participate were excluded from the study.
A total of 2000 children (975 male and 1025 female) were recruited for the study. Children with chronic medical disorders, cervical lymphadenomegaly, neck deformity, and those whose NC measurements were out of range for each gender and age (3rd-97th percentiles) were excluded to obtain normally distributed data. Upon exclusion of those participants who did not match the selection criteria, a total number of 1766 children (874 male and 892 female; 88.3% of sample size) were included in the study.
Chronological age which was calculated by subtracting date of birth from date of observation was used to determine cut-offs. Each quarter year elapsed from their birthday was used to obtain percentiles in short periods. The Ethics Committee of Erciyes University approved this study (2008/28). Written parental consent was obtained prior to the study.
All measurements were performed by well-trained health technicians. NC was measured using a plastic tape measure while the child’s head was held erect with eyes facing forward and the neck in a horizontal plane at the level of the most prominent portion, the thyroid cartilage. All measurements were taken with the subjects standing upright, with the face directed forward and shoulders relaxed. BMI was calculated according to the formula: weight (kg)/height (m)2. Children whose BMI was ≥95th percentile curve according to local references were identified as obese (3).
Construction of the percentile curves was performed with the LMS Chart Maker Pro version 2.3 software program (The Institute of Child Health, London) which fits smooth percentile curves to reference data. The smoothed percentile curves of NC were constructed by the LMS method. This method summarizes percentiles at each age based on the power of age-specific Box-Cox power transformations that are used to normalize data (22). These three quantities depend on age. The final curves of percentiles are produced by three smooth curves representing L (Lambda; skewness), M (M; median), and S (Sigma; coefficient of variation). With estimates of L, M, and S, values of X are connected to the values of z through the above equation. The percentile is obtained from a normal distribution table, where the z-score corresponds to the percentile of interest. In boys, the effective degrees of freedom (edf) for NC were equal to 3 (M curve), 4 (S curve), and 3 (L curve). In girls, edf for NC were equal to 3, 4, and 2, respectively. The median curves of boys and girls were compared to show gender-specific trends through 3-6 years.
Construction of the centile curves was performed with the LMS Chart Maker Pro version 2.3 software program (The Institute of Child Health, London) which fits smooth centile curves to reference data (22). Gender difference in NC was compared with student’s t-test. NC cutt-off values were calculated for 3-6-year-old children with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis according to dependent variable obesity defined by BMI ≥95th percentile (23). The ROC curves demonstrated the overall discriminatory power of a diagnostic test: NC. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to identify the optimal cut-off values. Calculated cut-offs were checked with Youden index as (J) ≥0.6 good and (J) ≥0.4 moderate. Descriptive statistics for each quarter year (e.g., 3-8 m, etc.) within sex were calculated by SPSS version 15.0 (Chicago, Illinois, USA).
Mean (standard deviation) and median (minimum-maximum) values for NC in Turkish children age of 2-6 years in both genders and comparisons of the means are shown in Table 1. Mean NC values were greater in males than females, and the difference was significant at age groups 30-32, 42-44, 48-50, 57-68, and 72-83 months. The mean increment from 24 to 83 months period was 1.4 cm for males and 0.5 cm for females (Table 1).
The calculated age-specific (at 3-month intervals) 3rd, 5th, 10th, 15th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 85th, 90th, 95th, and 97th percntiles for NC in each gender are given in Tables 2 and 3. The increase in NC for 50th percentile values through the 24 to 83 months period was 1.2 cm in boys and 0.6 in girls. The increase in NC through the 3rd to 97th percentiles for 24-26 months was 5.48 cm in boys. This value was 5.05 cm for 81-83 months (Table 2). The increases in NC through 3rd to 97th percentiles for 24-26 months and for 81-83 months in girls were 5.69 cm and 4.80 cm (Table 3).
ROC analysis was performed to calculate cut-off points for NC using BMI ≥95th percentile (for obesity) as a dependent variables. The results for boys and girls are shown in Tables 4 and 5. Youden index was also calculated for cut-off values and it was found to be statistically significant in both genders except 3 years old group of boys (Tables 4, 5). In case of obesity (BMI ≥95th), we found that cut-off points for NC were 25.9 and 27.0 cm for males who were 4 and 5 years old, respectively (a cut-off point calculated by ROC analysis and confirmed by Youden index ≥0.4) and that these values were 27.5 cm for males who were 6 years old (Youden index ≥0.6) (Table 4). Cut-off points for NC were 25.8 (Youden index ≥0.6), 25.8 (Youden index ≥0.6), 25.7 (Youden index ≥0.4), and 25.5 cm (Youden index ≥0.4) for females who were 3, 4, 5, and 6 years old, respectively (Table 5).
Figures 1 and 2 show comparisons of the 3rd, 50th, 97th NC percentiles of our data with the IDEFICS (Identification and prevention of Dietary- and lifestyle-induced health EFfects in Children and infantS) study (conducted on European children) in boys and girls, respectively. The data indicate that NC values of Turkish preschool children were slightly greater than those of other European preschool children in both genders. This difference disappears around the adiposity rebound period, and NC values of Turkish preschool children become slightly lower after this period except for the 97th percentile. This value continues to be greater in the Turkish preschool children in both genders as compared to the European data.
BMI is obviously the most commonly used anthropometric measure to assess obesity. However, BMI may fail to describe body fat distribution. Since upper body fat deposition is associated with an increased metabolic and cardiovascular risk (24,25,26), it is absolutely essential to determine fat accumulation in the upper body. Various anthropometric measures and indices may be used to determine upper body fat content and distribution such as waist circumference (WC), mid-upper arm circumference, skinfold thickness, waist/hip ratio, and waist/height ratio. WC is the most frequently used measure, which may have some measuring limitations such as its relationship with mid expiratory movement and consumption of excess food (9,15,27,28,29). Recently, NC has been shown as a reliable and easy alternative tool to WC for determining upper body fat accumulation and distribution (11,12,13,17,18,19). The advantages of measuring NC compared with WC are better inter- and intra-observer reliability, relative stability which is less affected by respiration and clothing (11,30).
In addition, it has been reported that NC may be used to assess both obesity and metabolic disorders (12,13). NC percentiles were also produced for school children and adolescents (20,21). However, information on preschool children is limited. Cunningham et al (1) have emphasized the importance of screening predominantly in preschool children. These authors have shown that the incidence of obesity between the ages of 5 and 14 years was 4 times higher in children who had been overweight at the age of 5 years compared with those of normal weight at that age. Therefore, it is essential to assess adiposity and unstable fat distribution before and during the adiposity rebound period (4,6,7,8). Since it was shown that early childhood adiposity has certain cardiologic and metabolic health consequences in later life, we need a reliable and easy-to-use measure for preschool children.
The available data about NC percentiles of preschool children was from a multicenter study (Sweden, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Cyprus, Spain, Belgium, Estonia) that included normal-weight 2.0-10.9-year-old European children (21). Formisano et al (18) later worked on these data and showed that cardiometabolic risk was associated with increased NC. We believe that this current study will be contributory to the importance of the role of NC measurements in young children by providing local reference data as well as by comparing these references with the most recent and reliable studies in Europe.
In our study, similar to data reported by Nagy et al (21) for children in the multicenter study, we found that NC values increase with age and that they are slightly higher in males. This gender difference becomes significant in children older than 5 years. However, the increase in NC through 24 to 83 months is relatively smaller than that reported by Nagy et al (21). The increase in 50th percentile NC values was 1.2 cm and 0.6 cm in our study, while the above authors reported an increase of 2.4 cm and 2.1 cm for boys and girls, respectively. Furthermore, NC percentile values in Turkish preschool children were slightly greater than those of the European preschool children in both genders (Figures 1, 2). This difference disappears around the rebound adiposity period and then NC values of Turkish preschool children decrease slightly. However, the 97th percentile NC values of Turkish preschool children continue to be greater than those of their European counterparts in both genders. These findings may be related to several factors such as sample selection, ethnic or geographical differences. The study cited above (21) included data from eight European countries. However, we do not know whether similar differences would exist if our data could have been compared with findings from each individual country separately. We must also note that the similarity of NC values during the rebound adiposity period found in our study slightly differs from those cited in the above study (Figures 1, 2).
We consider that this difference may be explained by environmental and other unknown factors that could have more predominant effects than genetic factors at the adiposity rebound period and later. This should be investigated in further studies.
This study provides NC cut-off values for obesity in Turkish preschool children. Additionally, it is the first study that reports NC percentiles and cut-offs in Turkish preschool children. The power of this study may be the stratification for socioeconomic level in a relatively big sample size which may represent Turkish population. Our findings show that NC may also be a useful tool to assess obesity in preschool children in addition to BMI, since it represents upper body fat distribution. However, the cut-off values of NC established in our study should be confirmed in subsequent studies.
In conclusion, this study provides reference and cut-off values for preschool Turkish children. Since NC findings may indicate future cardiometabolic risk, both our reference and cut-off values for NC may be useful for screening and follow-up.
Ethics Committee Approval: The Ethics Committee in Erciyes University approved this study in 2008 Number: 2008/28. Informed Consent: Written parental consent was obtained prior to the study.
Peer-review: Externally and internally peer-reviewed.
Concept: Selim Kurtoğlu, Mümtaz M. Mazıcıoğlu, Meda Kondolot, Design: Selim Kurtoğlu, Mümtaz M. Mazıcıoğlu, Ahmet Öztürk, Data Collection or Processing: Duygu Horoz, Serpil Poyrazoğlu, Arda Borlu, Analysis or Interpretation: Mümtaz M. Mazıcıoğlu, Ahmet Öztürk, Literature Search: Meda Kondolot, Mümtaz M. Mazıcıoğlu, Writing: Meda Kondolot, Mümtaz M. Mazıcıoğlu.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.
1. Cunningham SA, Kramer MR, Narayan KM. Incidence of childhood obesity in the United States. N Engl J Med 2014;370:403-411.
2. Lo JC, Maring B, Chandra M, Daniels SR, Sinaiko A, Daley MF, Sherwood NE, Kharbanda EO, Parker ED, Adams KF, Prineas RJ, Magid DJ, O’Connor PJ, Greenspan LC. Prevalence of obesity and extreme obesity in children aged 3-5 years. Pediatr Obes 2014;9:167-175. Epub 2013 May 15
3. Kondolot M, Balci E, Ozturk A, Mazicioglu MM, Hatipoglu N, Kurtoglu S, Ustunbas HB. Body mass index percentiles for Turkish children aged 0-84 months. Ann Hum Biol 2011;38:676-680. Epub 2011 Sep 29
4. Whitaker RC, Pepe MS, Wright JA, Seidel KD, Dietz WH. Early adiposity rebound and the risk of adult obesity. Pediatrics 1998;101:E5.
5. Han JC, Lawlor DA, Kimm SY. Childhood obesity. Lancet 2010;375:1737-1748. Epub 2010 May 5
6. Rolland-Cachera MF, Deheeger M, Bellisle F, Sempe M, Guilloud-Bataille M, Patois E. Adiposity rebound in children: a simple indicator for predicting obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 1984;39:129-135.
7. Rolland-Cachera MF, Deheeger M, Maillot M, Bellisle F. Early adiposity rebound: causes and consequences for obesity in children and adults. Int J Obes (Lond) 2006;30:11-17.
8. Ongg KK, Loos RJ. Rapid infancy weight gain and subsequent obesity: systematic reviews and hopeful suggestions. Acta Pediatr 2006;95:904-908.
9. Mei Z, Grummer-Strawn LM, Pietrobelli A, Goulding A, Goran MI, Dietz WH. Validity of body mass index compared with other body-composition screening indexes for the assessment of body fatness in children and adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr 2002;75:978-985.
10. Dezenberg CV, Nagy TR, Gower BA , Johnson R, Goran MI. Predicting body composition from anthropometry in pre-adolescent children. Int J Obes Metab Disord 1999;23:253-259.
11. Ben-Noun L, Laor A. Relationship of neck circumference cardiovascular risk factors. Obes Res 2003;11:226-231.
12. Hatipoglu N, Mazicioglu MM, Kurtoglu S, Kendirci M. Neck circumference: an additional tool of screening overweight and obesity in childhood. Eur J Pediatr 2010;169:733-739. Epub 2009 Nov 20
13. Nafiu OO, Burke C, Lee J, Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S, Tremper KK. Neck circumference as a screening measure for identifying children with high body mass index. Pediatrics 2010;126:306-310. Epub 2010 Jul 5
14. Sudi K, Gallistl S, Payerl D, Aigner R, Möller R, Tafeit E, Borkenstein MH. Interrelationship between estimates of adiposity and body fat distribution with metabolic and hemostatic parameters in obese children. Metabolism 2001;50:681-687.
15. Mazıoglu MM, Hatipoglu N, Oztürk A, Ciçek B, Ustünbaş HB, Kurtoğlu S. Waist circumference and mid-upper arm circumference in evaluation of obesity in children aged between 6 and 17 years. J Clin Res Ped Endocrinol 2010;2:144-150. Epub 2010 Dec 10
16. Ekelund U, Ongg KK, Linne Y, Neovius M, Brage S, Dunger DB, Wareham NJ, Rössner S. Association of weight gain in infancy and early childhood with metabolic risk in young adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:98-103. Epub 2006 Oct 10
17. Kurtoglu S, Hatipoglu N, Mazicioglu MM, Kondolot M. Neck circumference as a novel parameter to determine metabolic risk factors in obese children. Eur J Clin Invest 2012;42:623-630. Epub 2011 Nov 30
18. Formisano A, Bammann K, Fraterman A, Hadjigeorgiou C, Herrmann D, Iacoviello L, Marild S, Moreno LA, Nagy P, Van Den Bussche K, Veidebaum T, Lauria F, Siani A. Efficacy of neck circumference to identify metabolic syndrome in 3-10 year-old European children: Results from IDEFICS study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2016;26:510-516. Epub 2016 Feb 24
19. Lou DH, Yin FZ, Wang R, Ma CM, Liu XL, Lu Q. Neck circumference is an accurate and simple index for evaluating overweight and obesity in Han children. Ann Hum Biol 2012;39:161-165.
20. Mazicioglu MM, Kurtoglu S, Ozturk A, Hatipoglu N, Cicek B, Ustunbas HB. Percentiles and mean values for neck circumference in Turkish children aged 6-18 years. Acta Paediatr 2010;99:1847-1853.
21. Nagy P, Kovacs E, Moreno LA, Veidebaum T, Tornaritis M, Kourides Y, Siani A, Lauria F, Sioen I, Claessens M, Mårild S, Lissner L, Bammann K, Intemann T, Buck C, Pigeot I, Ahrens W, Molnár D; IDEFICS consortium. Percentile reference values for anthropometric body composition indices in European children from the IDEFICS study. Int J Obes (Lond) 2014;38(Suppl2):15-25.
22. Cole TJ, Green PJ. Smoothing reference centile curves: The LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med 1992;11:1305-1319.
23. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Sem Nuc Med 1978;8:283-298.
24. Kissebah AH, Krakower GR. Regional adiposity and morbidity. Physiol Rev 1994;74:761-811.
25. Daniels SR, Morrison JA, Sprecher DL, Khoury P, Kimball TR. Association of body fat distribution and cardiovascular risk factors in children and adolescents. Circulation 1999;99:541-545.
26. Owens S, Gutin B, Ferguson M, Allison J, Karp W, Le NA. Visceral adipose tissue and cardiovascular risk factors in obese children. J Pediatr 1998;133:41-45.
27. Hatipoglu N, Ozturk A, Mazicioglu MM, Kurtoglu S, Seyhan S, Lokoglu F. Waist circumference percentiles for 7- to 17-year-old Turkish children and adolescents. Eur J Pediatr 2008;167:383-389. Epub 2007 May 9
28. Ozturk A, Budak N, Cicek B, Mazicioglu MM, Bayram F, Kurtoglu S. Cross sectional reference values for mid-upper arm circumference, triceps skinfold thickness and arm fat area of Turkish children and adolescents. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2009;60:267-281.
29. Mason C, Katzmarzyk PT. Variability in waist circumference measurements according to anatomic measurement site. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009;17:1789-1795. Epub 2009 Apr 2
30. LaBerge RC, Vaccani JP, Gow RM, Gaboury I, Hoey L, Katz SL. Inter-and intra-rater reliability of neck circumference measurements in children. Pediatr Pulmonol 2009;44:64-69.